Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

2 Subjects

Case Study Analysis 3

Case Study Analysis 3

Q The purpose of this Case Study Analysis is to understand the fundamental elements of copyright law and the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. Instructions: Review Case # 2.1 in your text. At the end of each case there are questions, for each question include: a. The general answer to the question b. Identify the relevant statutes/legal doctrines/Federal acts or laws that are demonstrated. *Note that these can be from this chapter or previous chapters* c. Fully define the relevant statutes/legal doctrines/Federal acts or laws that are demonstrated. d. Explain how they apply and what it means for future cases of a similar nature. Submission Instructions: • Submit your case as a WORD document in the drop box for that assignment. (Properly formatted in MLA) Grading Criteria: • Refer to the grading Rubric for case analyses for additional guidance. • Worth 2 Points Due Sunday 11:59pm

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

This lawsuit focuses on the conflict between the opposing principles of encouraging technological innovation by minimizing infringement liability and fostering creativity by supporting copyright protection. Despite countervailing factors, there is a compelling case for implementing indirect liability for this situation considering the volume of unlawful downloads that occur using the respondents' product consistently (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. V. Grokster, Ltd.,2005). The main pragmatic option is to sue the merchant of the gadget for optional risk under the hypothesis of contributory or vicarious encroachment when a generally utilized item is utilized to disregard privileges in a safeguarded work since it very well might be difficult to uphold freedoms in the safeguarded work really against all immediate infringers.